Stage 9 of 10 · Operate and improve
Deliver and observe
How is the program performing with real learners?
- Purpose
- Run the program and collect evidence about it.
- Defining artefact
- Delivery signals, results, feedback, complaints and appeals
- Exit gate
- Cohort complete
- Failure it prevents
- Problems that are felt but never recorded
Deliver and observe runs the program with a cohort and collects evidence about how the program performs, not only about how learners perform. Problems that are felt but never recorded cannot be fixed.
What happens
- Deliver the release named at stage 8 to its cohort, and record which version they received.
- Collect the delivery signals below, and the context they came from: who taught, in what mode, with what changes.
- Log complaints, appeals and assessor disputes against the part of the program they concern.
- Hold changes to assessment until the next release, unless they fix a safety, accuracy or compliance defect.
Signals worth collecting
Each signal is tied to the outcome descriptors it concerns:
- Pass, resubmission and appeal rates per assessment item.
- Points in the sequence where learners stall or withdraw.
- Actual time on task compared with the planned session time.
- Trainer and assessor notes on what they skipped, reworked or supplemented.
- Learner feedback tied to specific modules, not only to the course as a whole.
Complaints, appeals and assessor disputes are treated as reports of possible defects in the program, each linked to the descriptor, task or content it concerns.
Guardrails for this stage
- Delivery data are signals to investigate, never automatic verdicts on content or people.
- Collect for program improvement only, with clear purpose limits, minimisation and transparency to learners.
- Record the delivery context, because the teacher is part of how a program performs.
- No changes to assessment mid-cohort, unless they correct a safety, accuracy or compliance defect.
At the gate, ask
- Is the cohort complete, and do we know which version every learner received?
- Was every problem that staff or learners raised written down, against the part of the program it concerns?
- Can we tell content issues from delivery issues in what we collected?
See all six guardrails and the practice of observability.