EDLC Education Development Lifecycle

Stage 9 of 10 · Operate and improve

Deliver and observe

How is the program performing with real learners?

Purpose
Run the program and collect evidence about it.
Defining artefact
Delivery signals, results, feedback, complaints and appeals
Exit gate
Cohort complete
Failure it prevents
Problems that are felt but never recorded

Deliver and observe runs the program with a cohort and collects evidence about how the program performs, not only about how learners perform. Problems that are felt but never recorded cannot be fixed.

What happens

  • Deliver the release named at stage 8 to its cohort, and record which version they received.
  • Collect the delivery signals below, and the context they came from: who taught, in what mode, with what changes.
  • Log complaints, appeals and assessor disputes against the part of the program they concern.
  • Hold changes to assessment until the next release, unless they fix a safety, accuracy or compliance defect.

Signals worth collecting

Each signal is tied to the outcome descriptors it concerns:

  • Pass, resubmission and appeal rates per assessment item.
  • Points in the sequence where learners stall or withdraw.
  • Actual time on task compared with the planned session time.
  • Trainer and assessor notes on what they skipped, reworked or supplemented.
  • Learner feedback tied to specific modules, not only to the course as a whole.

Complaints, appeals and assessor disputes are treated as reports of possible defects in the program, each linked to the descriptor, task or content it concerns.

Guardrails for this stage

  • Delivery data are signals to investigate, never automatic verdicts on content or people.
  • Collect for program improvement only, with clear purpose limits, minimisation and transparency to learners.
  • Record the delivery context, because the teacher is part of how a program performs.
  • No changes to assessment mid-cohort, unless they correct a safety, accuracy or compliance defect.

At the gate, ask

  • Is the cohort complete, and do we know which version every learner received?
  • Was every problem that staff or learners raised written down, against the part of the program it concerns?
  • Can we tell content issues from delivery issues in what we collected?

See all six guardrails and the practice of observability.